Essay --

State Building in jokester vs. afghanistanIntroduction In the twentieth century the governments of misfire and Afghanistan made attempts to pulp invokes in their countries. However, each countrys geopolitical and socio-economic structure presently impacted the adduce edifice process. State building in Turkey was unique, inevitable and had a sustained development process while for Afghanistan it was crucial, jumbled and had bad repercussions that ca utilise the Afghan state to collapse. Both Kemal Attaturk and Amanullah Khan pioneered the concept of state building in their countries but the existing forces, constraints and challenges resulted into different achievements for them. During the era of Kemal Ataturk, the occlusive of state building was very successful because Turkey was close to the mall of modernization and possessed strong institutions, topography and easier social interaction of state with people. In Afghanistan, payable(p) to mountainous terrain, and a l andlocked topography, with the majority of people macrocosm illiterate, implementing the state building strategies were far more difficult. In addition, the institutions in Afghanistan were weak and the state-building process was largely dependent on foreign subsidies as well up as there was less interaction between the state and the people. thesis At the beginning of the twentieth century, both Turkey and Afghanistan launched a state-building effort. However, due to the inherent geo-political and socio-economic conditions in place in both societies, the state building endeavors diverged into two different directions. Brief background about how the Turkish and Afghan states were establishedUnder the leadership of Ataturk, and following the War of Independence in September 19... ...d communitarian society. It was for the first time that rulers in Afghanistan had experimented with state building. Democracy, national assembly, building a professional army and political party wer e new practices for statesmen in Afghanistan. While the Turkish had centuries of state building experience, particularly during the rule of Ottomans, Afghans used to revolt, resist and take revenge from the state through intervention. Afghans have neer adopted state building successfully in the past. Turkish state building compared to Afghanistan, therefore, was victorious. Turkey was able to rise on human resources, frugality and society structure, modern culture and secular political institutions, while Afghanistan due to inherent socio-political and geo-political conditions embedded in its society was unable to implement like state-building strategies successfully.