Gun Control Research Essay

ProCon. org recently featured an expression that analyse heavy weapon falsify. Stricter state blast laws associated with fewer artillery deaths, study finds. The article discussed hero mark laws in states with fixeder laws tend to have none ordinate of artillery tie in homicides, and a suicide (ProCon para. 1) hoagy operate in the United States is befitting a wide spread issue and is becoming a problem e precisewhere. Although I am living in a city with uprising crime that has been skyrocketing over the years, I wasnt alert of this being an issue each(prenominal) over the United States.I decided to do some research to find out whether I am in favor of Gun sway laws or not. After reviewing many articles for and against gasolene influence, I found out that I do in fact agree with gunman mark laws. It became difficult to determine my side of the fray payable to there being a lot of negative and plus opinions some the issue. I feel homogeneous gun laws sh ould be in place to restore our countries gun tie in crime order in the U. S. The ProCon article argues that states with the strictest gun curb laws have lower rates of gun related homicides and suicides.The argument for gun control laws revolve around the statistics of gun control laws being stricter in certain states verses states with not so strict gun control laws. According to ProCon, the most inhibitory gun control laws have an average of 6. 64 fewer deaths per 100,000 pot per year than those with the least suppressive laws (ProConpara. 1). ProCon continues on to discuss the study piece of music Legislation and Firearm Related Fatalities in the United States, that was studied by different researchers that measurable the association between the legislative say-so of state gun control policies (ProCon para.1). The researchers then began to study the five categories used to create the legislative strength score which included laws designed to curb firearm trafficking str engthen ground checks on purchasers of firearms beyond those required by Brandy Handgun Violence measure Act ensure child safety ban military air assault weapons and restrict guns in public places (ProCon para. 1). The researchers then ranked all 50 states from 0 to 28 based on their score (ProCon para. 2). The high the score, the more restrictive the gun lawsin that state, stated the researchers (ProCon para. 2). This study is a very important rundown to our understanding of the connection between gun control and gun violence, said John Roman, a PhD, senior fellow. In addition to the general relationship between gun safety laws firearm deaths, as well suggests that increasing the number of gun safety laws increases the reductions in firearm related deaths. So the benefits just get bigger with more laws (ProCon para. 3). After translation the ProCon article, I found myself agreeing with the researchers.I can see different levels of gun related crimes all over the United States . Just by living in Fort Wayne, IN where there has been a peak in gun related crimes and deaths gives me proof that their study was indeed accurate. If more states had stricter gun control laws they would start to have lower rates of gun related homicides and suicides. Next, I went to an article by purify Baldwin, an American Politician, who disagreed with gun control laws here we go again. We have another mass shooting at until now another gun free z nonpareil.Not only was the location a gun free zone, it was located inside the nations capital, which has some of the strictest gun-control laws in the entire country, Stated Chuck Baldwin, (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin clearly has a strong unlikeness about gun control laws in the United States. In the name of the article, he stated, Guns dont kill people gun control laws kill people (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin then proceeds to talk about people basically abusing gun control laws and that they atomic number 18 use little beca use people atomic number 18 sleek over using guns in gun free zones. Mr.Baldwin argued, I mentation gun-control laws and gun-free zones were supposed to protect people from gun violence (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin proceeded to argue that Gun-Free zones are actually Free Killing zones (Baldwin para. 1). He then went on to inform how This is the second time in recent memory when some whacko shoots up a military installation (Baldwin para. 2). I feel like Mr. Baldwins logic behind gun control laws is kind of cogent because even though there are gun control laws, and gun free zones, doesnt mean that people are going to determine committing gun related crimes in places where there are laws in place.I evaluate that I might be swayed by Mr. Baldwins information, but I was not. I am definitely in favor of gun control laws. I also think that Mr. Baldwins argument was kind of reliable and he had a lot of good reasoning, but I still think that by enforcing gun control laws helps a l ot of states to lower their gun related crimes. However, I did not see anything on Chuck Baldwins article that proved gun control laws were good or bad. The final article that convinced me of my position came from the Congressional Digest.The article, Prevalence of Gun Use and the Regulatory Response doesnt focus on one side of the issue. Instead, it focuses on the different reasons gun control laws could or could not be effective. Some argue that the low violent crime rates of other countries have nothing to do with gun control, maintaining instead that quadruple ethnic differences are responsible (Gun para. 1). Through the years, legislative proposals to restrict the approachability of firearms to the public have raised the following questions What restrictions on firearms are permissible under the Constitution?Does gun control constitute crime control? Can the Nations rates of homicide, robbery, and assault be minify by the stricter regulation of firearms commerce or ownersh ip? Would restrictions stop attacks on public figures or thwart deranged persons and terrorists? Would household, street corner, and schoolyard disputes are less lethal if firearms were more difficult and expensive to acquire? Would more restrictive gun control policies have the unintended effect of impairing citizens means of self-defense? (Gun para.2) This article provided a lot of questions that I asked myself and I answered yes to more than fractional of the previous questions. I had not considered these questions until I read the Congressional Digest. I think that if the government really cracked down on gun control laws, people would actually see a change in gun related crimes. I feel like yes, more restrictive gun control policies have unintended effect of impairing citizens, and yes different cultural differences have nothing to do with gun control issues.After reading these articles on gun control laws, I am now more inform and can still say that gun control laws still should be enforced. I am surprised at the different views this issue has received. I found out that I do in fact agree with gun control laws. It became difficult to determine my side of the controversy due to there being a lot of negative and positive opinions about the issue. I feel like gun laws should be in place to restore our countries gun related crime rates and fatalities in the U. S.