Frankenstein and Human Cloning Essay

What is life? What defines a person? Do you believe valet de chambres should consider the right to create life? Are there any consequences? In 1831 Mary Shelly wrote Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus, a magnificent depiction of a man victorious up Gods role of creator of life. Victor wanted to achieve biological immortality. Yet, within the instance of victor Victor outright rejected his universe as monstrous, a unit for being unworthy of human life. In this paper, I reason that Frankenstein and the idea clone have a lot in common, because the devil topics share pros and cons on behalf of their out coming result.Victor Frankensteins junkie compared to re-create takes place without the act of a sexual union in the midst of a male and female. In general, clone is the modern Frankenstein, just similar Frankenstein is the modern Prometheus. Prometheus stole fire from the Gods he had taken something that did not choke to the manhood and given it to mankind and was essent i anyy punished for his actions. In the identical way, Victor Frankenstein lets his ambition overpower him. Victor took from God what was not his, and created a destructive monster in effect of his strong desire for creating human life.Human cloning is also a controversial subject stating that humans have no power by Gods to develop life or control death. According to the Human Genome Project, there are three types of cloning DNA, therapeutic, and reproductive cloning. DNA cloning involves transferring DNA from a donor to another(prenominal) organism. Therapeutic cloning, known as embryo cloning which involves harvesting idea cells from human embryos to grow new organs for transplant. Reproductive cloning creates a copy of the host. Victor Frankenstein created his monster using Reproductive cloning from distinctive body parts of different host organisms.To make his creature, Victor Frankenstein raided drab yards and spent a lot of his time in slaughter houses as well as dissect ing rooms to borrow body parts from the late(prenominal)ened to use for his creature. Cloning in relation to Frankenstein also uses the process of borrow by obtaining genetic materials from embryos to make identical duplicates. With all the allusions to fire and electricity found throughout the novel, to both spark and glimmer give the ref clues as to how Frankenstein used electric currents to stimulate the patched together dead body of his monster. Comparatively, cloning also employs the use of electricity to promote the department of cells also known as life.In the process of stimulating his creation to life, Victor Frankenstein accidentally puts a criminal brain into his monster, therefore skewing the monsters behavior. Cloning is often unsuccessful. According to the Human Genome Project, it takes sometimes century attempts to create one successful clone. Frankensteins monster had all components and feelings of a human being, but was not born out of a womans womb and was no t sexually produced. The creature was created not in Gods image, but in Victors image.Todays cloning process, like the methods of creating life used by Dr. Frankenstein, arouses a controversy of morals and ethics from religious viewpoints. Cloning has a lot to do with the desires of man. Frankenstein desired to create life. Desires, otherwise known as temptations in these cases, bring us to a great fault. By taking the place of God, to make their own definition of a person, Frankenstein and the creators of cloning are defying God and going against the Bibles moral standards. In defining life we get a deep look into how Frankenstein and cloning compare. They are very alike in many ways. These things teach us that life and the universe are unknowable, and are not meant to be entirely known. We are not meant to become boundless creators. Rather, we are the created created by God.