Employment Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Employment Law - strive ExampleBased on the reported facts, at the onset before T all(prenominal)a was actually hired by your company, she already concealed a material information prior to her employment, which was her medical condition as she suffered from fifth cranial nerve Neuralgia. Her present medical condition constrained her to report to daily to work if she is suffering an attack. Clearly, your company is already experiencing losses due to her absences. The constant conflict between Brian and Tanya must be resolved by the employer. Brians act of falsely accusing Tanya as useless and not being capable of carrying out her caper already constitutes as a form of harassment (Isle of Wight Tourist Board v Coombes 1976 IRLR 413). As the boss of both Brian and Tanya, you are expected to resolve the friction between the two employees and to stop any form of harassment and to make sure to avoid it from happening again in the future. On the reveal of incompetency of Tanya, it was recently discovered that she committed major blnethers in the company while she was still an employee because the banking records are inaccurate and whats worse is that she even misappropriated a sum of money since the petty bullion fund is short by a ?100, which was under her custody while she was still an employee. This is a primitive misconduct on her part and considered as stealing money from the company. I. ANALYSIS Under the law, a shaping dismissal case will only prosper if it satisfies the requirements provided under the law. The Employee Rights Act of 1996 of Section 95(c) provides that the employee annuls the contract under which he is employed with or without notice in circumstances in which he is entitled to terminate it without notice by reason of the employers conduct (Employee Rights Act 1996). In these circumstances, the employers behaviour constitutes a repudiation of the contract and the employee accepts the repudiation by resigning (Lewis 2009, p.210). In the case at bar, Tanya informed the employer that she is no longish reporting to work because of the oral conduct of Brian against her. Here, it is not the employers conduct or behaviour which oblige Tanya to resign, but was caused by Brians verbal abuse on her. In all fairness to you as the employer, you made reasonable efforts to prevent the harassment from happening again by telling Brian to stop the verbal abuse on Tanya. However, Brian was still not able to resist throwing invectives against Tanya in the workplace. The day after her remnant fight with Brian, she immediately filed the case without going through mediation. On the other hand, under the Protection from bedevilment Act of 1997, a person must not pursue a conduct (a) which amounts to harassment of some other and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of another (Protection from Harassment Act 1997). Clearly, Brian is guilty of verbally abusing Tanya every time he accuses her of incompetence in fr om of people in the office (Cortaulds v Andrew 1979 IRLR 85 ). Thus, this exercise will fall as harassment on the part of Brian. As a general rule, the employer is nonresistant for the acts of its employees under the principle of vicarious liability. However, the employer can avoid liability for discriminatory harassment if they can boot out that they took such steps that were reasonably practical to prevent harassment from occurring. Furthermore, individual employees may also be liable, for