Group Effectiveness Essay Example for Free

Group Effectiveness EssayDue to the constantly changing business world companies ar seeking to inspire their engagementers to be imaginative and work together, and then the emergence of assort work (Bray Brawley, 2002). The usance of this essay is to show how Anconas model discount be used to analyse a assemblages authorisation thus presenting an on a lower floorstanding of factors, which facilitate and hinder long suit. In this essay I moot how my team was highly effective due to vista of personality, utilizing diversity of skills and bopledge and show how intensity could put up been improven by allocation of use of goods and servicess, specifically that of a clear attracter. Furthermore, I acknowledge that I survive more effectively in a well structured and compatible team. Individual and team basisvas as well as scholarly articles will be utilized to provide further keenness into root word effectiveness. Effectiveness defined as a measure of the degree t o which objectives ar achieved and targeted problems solved (Moore, 1996 348), heap be evaluated by, but not limited to classify performance, member rapture, team learning and outsider satisfaction (Ancona et al. , 2004) (Appendix 1).In the context of my convention, effectiveness involved high interaction, learning and overall efficiency of proletariat. Sources of group feedback, outer limiting criteria and a team effectiveness written report were enlisted to help quantify group effectiveness in these areas (Appendix 2-5). A mark of 14/15 was a primary indication of the groups performance, indicating the line had been completed with great growth, content and presentation (Appendix 2), Furthermore, post assessment group discussion and surveys concluded members were respectively pleased and had learnt from the experience.A mutual rating of strongly agree on of team learning, satisfaction as a member of the group and superior lumber of work as well as a strongly disagree w ith respect to inability to integrate our viewpoints, indicate that members privately believed that the collective context and processes of the group were effective. Anconas model states that effectiveness is a direct endpoint of great skill of context and process of group (Ancona et al. , 2004). This theory will be examined through the analysis of the factors which facilitated and hindered my groups effectiveness.Ehrhart (2004) furthering Anconas model, focuses on the design of a group, specifically compatibility of members with organization to increases proficiency of task. From the outset the task was handled with values of high performance, learning and engagement, all of which are congruent with that of the the organization (The University of Queensland) (University of Queensland, 2010). In line with Ehrharts theory this compatibility allowed efficiency evident in a comprehensive completion of task. Building once again on this notion of context is Monahan and Muchinskys perso n-group chink theory (1987).It specifies that efficiency is created when members goals, values and personality traits are similar. This was evident in my groups members initial attraction to join based on similar personality traits maturity of age and extraversion. Hence this fit assisted us to work as cohesive and instil trust in one another. In contrast Monahan (Monahan and Muchinskys 1987) complementary model suggests that, if managed correctly diversity of members skills, experience and personality type (introverted vs extraverted) apprize improve performance as members add unique attributes that are necessary for success.Monahan specified that heterogeneous teams allowed for some(prenominal) strong and passive personalities improving team decision-making and learning whereas homogeneously extraverted groups lead to power struggles, thus decreasing effectiveness. Noticeably my group correlated with Monahans theory believing that diversity of backgrounds, skills and experience (a mother, HR manager, ex-navy engineer and third year student) assisted in achievement of goals. Furthermore as my group was nemine contradicente extraverted there was difficulty in making decisions, creativity as well as bout was an issue.An example of this was the groups inability to create workshop activities that excited and engaged participation from introverted bod mates. This proved Monahans theory of necessity for diversity to foster effectiveness. Most important for effectiveness in my group was the establishment of hazardive group norms. Tagger and Ellis (2007) express that team norms can influence individual team members problem solving behaviours and organize the teams thinking.The article specifically acknowledges that the absence of norms can detract from team effectiveness. My groups norms, as set by group memorandum (Appendix 3) proved Tagger and Ellis theory creating an effective operating climate by structuring the task, setting objectives, expectations, rewa rds, retributions and deadlines. Initially setting norms of specific run into times, email as a constant communication channel and recording minutes from each shock ensured that members were continually aware as to what was pass judgment and what would be accepted.Hence an effective structure for the group was organize. plot of land these elements of group context, compatibility, fit, diversity and group norms, were effective they were not maximized due to the problems in group processing, specifically those of role assignment and drawship. Team processes decision making, communication, team leadership and troth management, are all super important to group effectiveness (Ancona et al. 2004).Whilst in the majority each of these elements were dealt with effectively, as indicated by the teams overall mark of 14/15 (Appendix 2), issues did arise which threatened the cohesion of the group. Belbins team roles survey revealed group members to be spread across most roles (Appendix 4 ). As such members were not allocated specific roles, rather slotting into any role necessary. Simultaneously there was no intelligibly defined leader, quite the leadership position shifted continuously (Appendix 5). Whilst in the short term this was effective, long term it could create task ambiguity.As Bandura (1997) stated, if one does not know what demand is to be fulfilled one cannot accurately judge whether one has the requisite abilities to perform the task Discrepancies between efficiency belief and performance will arise when either the tasks or the circumstances under which they are performed are ambiguous (p. 64). Thus, using Banduras reasoning, task efficieny was decreased as a result of task ambiguity due to the lack of defined roles, specifically that of a clear leader. Furthermore survey results (see appendix) highlight that communication was an issue.In todays fastpaced world realistic communication use is crutial, as yet with it comes disadvantages namely lack of nonverbal communication and misunderstandings (Hortwitz et al. ). Hortwitz et al. highlights therefore the importance of a leader to observe and comprehend these virtual interactions. Without a clear leader, decisions can be poor, conflict can arise and overall effectiveness decreased. This was evident in our group as we did not deplete a clear leader, thus virtual communicaton was poorly structured leading to duplication of work, confusions with decision-making and planning difficulties.Thus, it is evident by these compounding elements of process that clearly defined roles and communication are essential for group effectiveness. These factors combined with a clearly defined leader and an effective group context lay the foundation for group effectiveness. season grading well, effectiveness of the group could arrest been improved. Group context was beneficial, mixing both homogeneous personalities with heterogeneous skills and backgrounds created a fun and creative atmosphere (Appendix 5). However this does not necessarily facilitate outsider satisfaction.This was the case with our group workshop whereby assort interaction was difficult to initiate. As all group members were like-minded, we did not think our product would not work on less like-minded participants. If there was diversity, introverted and extraverted, members could have collaborated more effectively, made better quality decisions thus produce a more engaging performance. Furthermore we didnt utilize external devises to our advantage. By simple actions of talking with past students, our lecturer or testing our workshop on other class members we could have improved our mark and learnt more about our task, thus been more effective.Most importantly, the groups effectiveness was severely decreased by task ambiguity created by the lack of clear leadership. While this was not a major issue it was agreed that if the task involved a monetary reward, conflict would have arisen, further decreasing e ffectiveness. This group experience has taught me alot about myself and how I work in teams. I have learnt more about the theory of how a groups context and operations affect effectiveness but more importantly how these elements can be manipulated to increase effectiveness.Primarily I observe the benefits of group norms in setting a code of behaviour as well as directional me personally. I found that within the group environment these norms helped me to understand more clearly the extent to which my group members regarded the assignment and work accordingly. Furthermore as norms were set early there was a higher tackiness within the group that allowed me to learn and to participate to my full potential. I have the weakness of being besides controlling with group work. With group norms setting out guidelines and expectations I was able to be less dominating, instead concentrating on the task at hand.More importantly, this experience has highlighted the importance of a group leade r. I have the potential to be doubtful and over analytical about my work, hence a specific leader is essential for me to get on track with a task as without one I break a focussing to withdraw due to anxiety. A clear leader is therefore essential for my performance as they can guide and react to circumstances or perceived threats. Furthermore the use of homogeneity of personality, hetrogenity of skill and formed group norms is diminished if theres no clear governing body to overlook, present feedback and upkeep communication.Thus in group situations I will concentrate on personality testings to ensure selected members have compatible personalities as well as concentrating on leadership development and cementing progressive norms, setting the way for successful processes and thus an effective group. Therefore, as evidenced by the application of Anconas model of effectiveness for the above study, it can be seen that it is a useful tool in providing detailed insight into group effect iveness.Throughout this essay the analysis of group context and processes were particularly helpful in providing an understanding of cardinal factors that affect effectiveness. Highlighted were the need for group context to include compatibility, fit, diversity and norms as well as processes with a clearly defined leader and effective communication. Hence with this insight it can be expected that a group that adopts these concepts into their group dynamic is likely to be considered an effective group.